Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
Snowball Effect Feared in Nuke Deal    06/26 06:11

   DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) -- As Iran prepares to surpass limits set 
by its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, each step it takes narrows the time 
the country's leaders would need to have enough highly enriched uranium for an 
atomic bomb --- if they chose to build one.

   The United Nations says Iran has so far respected the deal's terms. But by 
Thursday, Iran says it will have over 300 kilograms (660 pounds) of 
low-enriched uranium in its possession, which would mean it had broken out of 
the atomic accord.

   European countries that are still a part of the nuclear accord face a July 7 
deadline imposed by Tehran to offer a better deal and long-promised relief from 
U.S. sanctions, or Iran will also begin enriching its uranium closer to 
weapons-grade levels.

   Breaking the stockpile limit by itself doesn't radically change the one year 
experts say Iran would need to have enough material for a bomb. Coupled with 
increasing enrichment, however, it begins to close that window and hamper any 
diplomatic efforts at saving the accord.

   "I worry about the snowball effect," said Corey Hinderstein, a vice 
president at the Washington-based Nuclear Threat Initiative who once led the 
U.S. Energy Department's Iran task force. "Iran now takes a step which puts 
Europe and the other members of the deal in an even-tougher position."

   Under terms of the nuclear deal, Iran agreed to have less than 300 kilograms 
(661 pounds) of uranium enriched to a maximum of 3.67%. Previously, Iran 
enriched as high as 20%, which is a short technical step away from reaching 
weapons-grade levels. It also held up to 10,000 kilograms (22,046 pounds) of 
the higher-enriched uranium.

   Experts who spoke to The Associated Press described the enrichment and 
stockpile limits in the deal as a sort of sliding scale. Balancing both 
elements keeps Iran a year away from having enough material for a nuclear 
weapon, something Iran denies it seeks despite Western concerns about its 
program.

   At the time of the deal, which was signed by Iran, the United States, China, 
Russia, Germany, France and Britain, experts believed Iran needed anywhere from 
several weeks to three months to have enough material for a bomb.

   However, the stockpile limit isn't an immediate worry from a 
nonproliferation standpoint, experts say.

   "Going over the limit doesn't immediately signify that Iran has enough 
material that could --- if further enriched and processed --- be used in a 
nuclear weapon," said Tom Plant, the director of proliferation and nuclear 
policy at London's Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security 
Studies.

   "It does mean that it builds up reserves of material that could in the 
future support a more rapid push to the higher levels of enrichment that are 
suitable for weapons use," Plant said.

   The danger comes July 7, if Iran begins enriching uranium to higher levels.

   "If Iran begins stockpiling uranium enriched to higher levels, the breakout 
timeline would decrease more quickly," said Kelsey Davenport, the director of 
nonproliferation policy at the Washington-based Arms Control Association.

   Both Davenport and Ian Stewart, a professor at King's College London who 
runs its antiproliferation studies program called Project Alpha, worry about 
miscalculations from Iran, the U.S. or the West amid the brinksmanship.

   "This highlights the real tension at play in Iran: doing enough to satisfy 
Iranian hard-liners while also maintaining EU, Chinese and Russian support" for 
the deal, Stewart said. "There's a real risk of miscalculating, not least 
because it's not clear at which point the EU will have to back away from a 
noncompliant Iran."

   Davenport says Iran's moves probably are aimed at gaining leverage in 
negotiations.

   "Even if Iran decided to pursue a nuclear weapon, it would still take months 
to further enrich and weaponize the uranium," she said. "It is critical that 
the United States does not overreact to a stockpile breach and use it as an 
excuse to further ratchet up tensions in the region."

   A year after President Donald Trump's unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear 
deal, the U.S. and Iran are already locked in a volatile standoff. Last week, 
Iran shot down a U.S. military drone, saying it violated Iranian airspace, 
though Washington said it was above international waters. The U.S. has blamed 
Iran for mysterious explosions targeting oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz. 
Tehran denied any involvement.

   Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to stop Iran 
from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Israel has bombed nuclear facilities in Iraq 
and Syria in the past, and reportedly pushed for a similar strike in Iran prior 
to the 2015 deal.

   Iran, for now, allows U.N. inspectors to monitor its nuclear facilities via 
in-person checks and surveillance cameras. It also has yet to begin widespread 
use of advanced centrifuges that would speed its enrichment. Experts fear 
either of those happening.

   Once Iran starts going beyond the terms of the nuclear deal, one fact 
remains indisputable: the time it needs to have enough material for a possible 
atomic bomb starts dropping.

   "As soon as they go over 300 or above 3.67, that number is starting to count 
down from one year," Hinderstein warned. "So if they do both, then it's just 
going to steepen that line from one year to wherever they end up."


(KA)

 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN